H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Virginia Wade vs Terry Holladay H2H: 3-1
Virginia Wade holds a 3–1 lead over Terry Holladay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Virginia Wade leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Terry Holladay won the 1980 Detroit second round 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 81
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 1980* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Terry Holladay | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1976 | Palm Springs | WTA 250 | BR | Hard | Virginia Wade | 8-5 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1976* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Virginia Wade | 6-1 4-6 6-1 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
| Jan 23, 1976* | Landover | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-4 6-2 | Terry Holladay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Wade | #138 | #40 | — | 2,313 | 865 | 314 | 73.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 51 | 58 |
| Terry Holladay | #395 | #39 | 7 | 1,935 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Virginia Wade | Terry Holladay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1968 | 85–19 | 81.7% | — | 1,945 | 1 | 9 | 1978 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1969 | 82–18 | 82.0% | — | 2,118 | 1 | 16 | 1979 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1970 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 21 | 1980 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1971 | 64–16 | 80.0% | — | 2,161 | 1 | 29 | 1981 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1972 | 75–23 | 76.5% | — | 2,151 | 2 | 34 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1973 | 63–16 | 79.7% | — | 2,158 | 2 | 40 | 1983 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1974 | 60–16 | 78.9% | — | 2,189 | 2 | 45 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #50 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1975 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 2,313 | 2 | 51 | 1985 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1976 | 48–17 | 73.8% | — | 2,256 | 2 | 53 | 1986 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #103 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1977 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,274 | 3 | 55 | 1987 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1978 | 69–25 | 73.4% | — | 2,240 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 51–26 | 66.2% | — | 2,088 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 30–21 | 58.8% | — | 1,885 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,824 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,749 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,788 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #61 | 1,728 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1985 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,712 | 3 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |