H2H data updated: 2026-11-07 00:00 UTC

Viviana Gonzalez vs Zenda Liess H2H: 0-1

Zenda Liess holds a 1–0 lead over Viviana Gonzalez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Zenda Liess leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zenda Liess won the 1978 Canadian Open quarterfinal 1-6 6-3 6-4.

H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zenda Liess 1-6 6-3 6-4 Viviana Gonzalez Match data Aug 19, 1978* QF Canadian Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Viviana Gonzalez — — — 1,670 33 34 49.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Zenda Liess — — — 1,742 42 61 40.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Viviana Gonzalez Zenda Liess
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1974 7–7 50.0% — 1,554 0 0
15 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,573 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1976 7–4 63.6% — 1,668 0 0
17 1975 0–1 0.0% — 1,469 0 0 1977 4–13 23.5% — 1,615 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1978 16–17 48.5% — 1,741 0 0
19 1977 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0 1979 3–11 21.4% — 1,661 0 0
20 1978 13–12 52.0% — 1,600 0 0 1980 1–4 20.0% — 1,610 0 0
21 1979 3–9 25.0% — 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1980 16–10 61.5% — 1,637 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Viviana Gonzalez Zenda Liess
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1975 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 6 6 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 6 8 14 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0%
19 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1980 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1980 — — — — 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 3 5 8 37.5% 25 18 43 58.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — 9 19 28 32.1% 23 24 47 48.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 13 18 27.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Viviana Gonzalez Zenda Liess
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1554 119.5 — — — — — -29 — 50.0% +0.32 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.48
15 1973 1488 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.11 1975 1574 114.9 — — — — — +15 — 47.8% -0.09 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.01
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1669 124.1 — — — — — +27 — 59.1% +1.09 1–1 — — +0.31
17 1975 1470 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.31 1977 1616 124.5 — — — — -88 +66 — 30.6% -1.64 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 -0.81
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1741 135.8 — — — — -79 -35 — 50.0% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -0.38
19 1977 1493 118.7 — — — — — — — 60.0% +1.60 0–1 — — -0.04 1979 1662 120.5 — — — — -28 -5 — 28.1% -1.97 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.39
20 1978 1600 123.6 — — — — +11 +73 — 55.8% +0.17 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.75 1980 1610 95.4 — — — — -74 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
21 1979 1554 105.0 — — — — — +107 -49 21.7% -2.04 0–1 0–1 — +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1980 1637 118.1 — — — — — +102 — 56.6% +0.64 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1671 120.3 — — — — +11 +92 -49 49.3% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 +6.85 — 1742 131.5 — — — — -71 +6 — 43.4% -0.57 11–17 (39%) 10–9 (53%) 98.1 -0.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.