H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Wendy Gilchrist vs Billie Jean King H2H: 0-5

Billie Jean King holds a 5–0 lead over Wendy Gilchrist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Billie Jean King leads 4–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Billie Jean King won the 1972 Columbus fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wendy Gilchrist
AUS Age 76 Left-Handed
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Billie Jean King
Age 82 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 5, 1972* Columbus WTA 250 R16 Clay Billie Jean King 6-3 6-4 Wendy Gilchrist Match data
Apr 14, 1972* St. Petersburg WTA 500 R32 Clay Billie Jean King 6-3 6-3 Wendy Gilchrist Match data
Jun 25, 1971* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Billie Jean King 4-6 6-1 6-0 Wendy Gilchrist Match data
May 13, 1971* Fulham WTA 250 R32 Clay Billie Jean King 6-1 6-1 Wendy Gilchrist Match data
Apr 9, 1971* St. Petersburg WTA 500 R16 Clay Billie Jean King 6-2 6-1 Wendy Gilchrist Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Wendy Gilchrist — — — 1,764 135 167 44.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Billie Jean King #22 #13 — 2,402 684 160 81.0% 9 1 0 3 59 72

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wendy Gilchrist Billie Jean King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1968 6–6 50.0% — 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1969 15–21 41.7% — 1,597 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1970 7–5 58.3% — 1,655 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1971 21–19 52.5% — 1,756 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1972 21–31 40.4% — 1,694 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1973 13–18 41.9% — 1,633 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1974 17–17 50.0% — 1,623 0 4 1968 40–5 88.9% — 1,823 2 6
25 1975 19–22 46.3% — 1,574 0 5 1969 58–14 80.6% — 2,043 2 11
26 1976 2–6 25.0% — 1,544 0 5 1970 47–11 81.0% — 2,172 2 16
27 1977 0–4 0.0% — 1,504 0 5 1971 114–15 88.4% — 2,293 3 33
28 1978 5–6 45.5% — 1,506 0 5 1972 89–15 85.6% — 2,341 6 43
29 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,486 0 5 1973 56–12 82.4% — 2,294 7 50
30 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,470 0 5 1974 54–8 87.1% — 2,300 8 56
31 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,462 0 5 1975 23–3 88.5% — 2,370 9 58
32 1982 5–4 55.6% — 1,501 0 5 1976 2–2 50.0% — 2,316 9 58
33 1983 1–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 6 1977 46–6 88.5% — 2,386 9 64
34 — — — — — — — 1978 28–12 70.0% — 2,301 9 64
35 — — — — — — — 1979 36–13 73.5% — 2,164 9 66
36 — — — — — — — 1980 39–15 72.2% — 2,122 9 69
37 — — — — — — — 1981 4–5 44.4% — 2,019 9 69
38 — — — — — — — 1982 26–19 57.8% — 1,932 9 70
39 — — — — — — — 1983 22–5 81.5% — 2,052 9 72