H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Wendy Gilchrist vs Francoise Durr H2H: 0-4
Francoise Durr holds a 4–0 lead over Wendy Gilchrist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Francoise Durr leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Francoise Durr won the 1977 Sydney third round 6-4 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 76
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 83
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 1977* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Francoise Durr | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1972 | Washington | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Francoise Durr | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1971* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Francoise Durr | (w/o) | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1971* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Francoise Durr | 6-2 6-0 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Gilchrist | — | — | — | 1,764 | 135 | 167 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Francoise Durr | — | — | — | 2,144 | 373 | 235 | 61.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Gilchrist | Francoise Durr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 21–31 | 40.4% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 20–10 | 66.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1977 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 47–26 | 64.4% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1978 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 86–36 | 70.5% | — | 2,112 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 50–25 | 66.7% | — | 2,017 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,056 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 2,036 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 1982 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,913 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 9 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 9 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 9 |