H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Wendy Gilchrist vs Gail Sherriff H2H: 0-1
Gail Sherriff holds a 1–0 lead over Wendy Gilchrist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gail Sherriff leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gail Sherriff won the 1968 Brisbane fourth round 6-2 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 76
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 81
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 1968* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Gail Sherriff | 6-2 8-6 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Gilchrist | — | — | — | 1,764 | 135 | 167 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Gail Sherriff | — | — | — | 1,978 | 342 | 145 | 70.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 41 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Gilchrist | Gail Sherriff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 21–31 | 40.4% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 13 |
| 24 | 1974 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 4 | 1969 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 1975 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 52–19 | 73.2% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 21 |
| 26 | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 49–20 | 71.0% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 23 |
| 27 | 1977 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 35–13 | 72.9% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 28 |
| 28 | 1978 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 28 |
| 29 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,877 | 0 | 34 |
| 30 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 38 |
| 31 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 38 |
| 32 | 1982 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 38 |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 15–6 | 71.4% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 39 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 39 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 40 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 41 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 41 |