H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Wendy Gilchrist vs Gail Sherriff H2H: 0-1

Gail Sherriff holds a 1–0 lead over Wendy Gilchrist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gail Sherriff leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gail Sherriff won the 1968 Brisbane International round of 16 6-2 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wendy Gilchrist
AUS Age 76 Left-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Gail Sherriff
FRA Age 81 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gail Sherriff 6-2 8-6 Wendy Gilchrist Match data Dec 11, 1968* R16 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Wendy Gilchrist — — — 1,769 135 167 44.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,998 346 145 70.5% 0 0 0 0 38 38

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wendy Gilchrist Gail Sherriff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1968 6–6 50.0% — 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1969 15–21 41.7% — 1,594 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1970 7–5 58.3% — 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1971 21–19 52.5% — 1,763 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1972 21–31 40.4% — 1,698 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1973 13–18 41.9% — 1,633 0 1 1968 69–14 83.1% — 1,861 0 10
24 1974 17–17 50.0% — 1,623 0 4 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,801 0 14
25 1975 19–22 46.3% — 1,572 0 5 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,938 0 18
26 1976 2–6 25.0% — 1,543 0 5 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,929 0 20
27 1977 0–4 0.0% — 1,502 0 5 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,837 0 25
28 1978 5–6 45.5% — 1,502 0 5 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,742 0 25
29 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,482 0 5 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,854 0 31
30 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,467 0 5 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,823 0 35
31 1981 0–1 0.0% — — 0 5 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,790 0 35
32 1982 5–4 55.6% — 1,504 0 5 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,752 0 35
33 1983 1–0 100.0% — 1,522 0 6 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,769 0 36
34 — — — — — — — 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,719 0 36
35 — — — — — — — 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,701 0 37
36 — — — — — — — 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,709 0 38
37 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 38

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Wendy Gilchrist Gail Sherriff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1968 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1969 0 3 3 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1970 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1971 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1972 1 4 5 20.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1973 2 1 3 66.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1968 — — — — 58 8 66 87.9% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — —
24 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 0 1 100.0% 1969 3 2 5 60.0% 26 9 35 74.3% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — —
25 1975 1 3 4 25.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1970 — — — — 39 11 50 78.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1971 — — — — 29 11 40 72.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — —
27 1977 — — — — — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
28 1978 — — — — — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1979 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1974 — — — — 26 6 32 81.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
30 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 1982 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 1983 — — — — — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% — — — — 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 9 18 27 33.3% 49 54 103 47.6% 43 60 103 41.7% 15 22 37 40.5% — 12 7 19 63.2% 244 78 322 75.8% 69 51 120 57.5% 3 4 7 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Wendy Gilchrist Gail Sherriff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1968 1521 102.0 — — — — — +11 -7 50.0% -0.14 2–2 (50%) — — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1969 1595 113.9 — — — — -44 -39 -69 44.7% -0.33 5–8 (38%) — — -1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1970 1654 123.0 — — — — — — -14 57.1% +0.47 2–2 (50%) — — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1971 1763 124.5 — — — — -128 -159 +2 50.5% -0.44 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 108.8 -0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1972 1699 136.7 — — — — -93 -56 +13 42.7% -0.60 5–8 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 98.8 -5.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1973 1634 118.1 — — — — -1 +46 -37 42.3% -0.65 5–4 (56%) — — -0.76 1968 1861 142.2 — — — — — +190 -283 81.1% +2.55 7–4 (64%) — — +1.11
24 1974 1623 114.0 — — — — -21 +54 -21 49.3% -0.03 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — +3.02 1969 1802 140.9 — — — — -199 +203 -86 70.4% +1.76 2–5 (29%) — — -0.45
25 1975 1572 119.0 — — — — +10 +75 -20 48.4% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 +1.15 1970 1938 147.4 — — — — -325 +71 -84 69.8% +1.56 7–4 (64%) — — -3.95
26 1976 1543 104.5 — — — — — — +8 31.6% -1.32 1–2 (33%) — — +0.95 1971 1929 151.8 — — — — — +128 -64 70.3% +1.59 8–8 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 97.7 -3.26
27 1977 1503 104.4 — — — — — — -37 20.0% -1.90 0–2 1–1 — +0.29 1972 1837 140.7 — — — — -55 +123 -77 68.7% +1.58 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +0.94
28 1978 1502 109.9 — — — — — — -37 45.8% +0.13 1–1 1–1 — +1.14 1973 1743 112.1 — — — — -27 +149 — 39.1% -0.52 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.1 +0.20
29 1979 1483 99.2 — — — — — +105 — 40.0% -1.50 0–2 4–0 (100%) — +1.19 1974 1854 142.4 — — — — — +166 -128 72.0% +1.63 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — -0.12
30 1980 1468 97.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.13 1975 1824 140.3 — — — — -83 +144 — 58.1% +0.79 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 103.4 -0.18
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1790 139.8 — — — — — +74 — 63.9% +1.52 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 90.7 +0.01
32 1982 1504 105.2 — — — — — +67 +16 52.6% +0.95 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +1.55 1977 1753 108.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.46
33 1983 1523 95.2 — — — — — — — 66.7% 0.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.30 1978 1770 126.7 — — — — — +81 -68 60.4% +0.92 7–1 (88%) 3–2 (60%) 105.3 +0.81
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1719 114.6 — — — — — — — 27.3% -0.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.54
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1702 129.0 — — — — — +183 -49 65.6% +1.69 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.49
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1710 113.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.11 1–0 — — +0.27
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1698 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.21
Career — 1769 123.1 — — — — -65 +4 -18 46.0% -0.36 44–47 (48%) 19–12 (61%) 105.9 +0.86 — 1999 147.8 — — — — -122 +140 -103 68.6% +1.59 51–46 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 92.8 -0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.