H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Wendy Gilchrist vs Kate Latham H2H: 0-1

Kate Latham holds a 1–0 lead over Wendy Gilchrist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1974 Phoenix Aztec round of 64 6-1 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wendy Gilchrist
AUS Age 76 Left-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 6-1 3-6 6-3 Wendy Gilchrist Match data Apr 10, 1974* R64 Phoenix Aztec WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Wendy Gilchrist — — — 1,769 135 167 44.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wendy Gilchrist Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1968 6–6 50.0% — 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1969 15–21 41.7% — 1,594 0 0 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1970 7–5 58.3% — 1,654 0 0 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1971 21–19 52.5% — 1,763 0 1 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1972 21–31 40.4% — 1,698 0 1 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1973 13–18 41.9% — 1,633 0 1 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1974 17–17 50.0% — 1,623 0 4 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 1975 19–22 46.3% — 1,572 0 5 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 1976 2–6 25.0% — 1,543 0 5 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 1977 0–4 0.0% — 1,502 0 5 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 1978 5–6 45.5% — 1,502 0 5 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,482 0 5 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,467 0 5 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 1981 0–1 0.0% — — 0 5 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 1982 5–4 55.6% — 1,504 0 5 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6
33 1983 1–0 100.0% — 1,522 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Wendy Gilchrist Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1968 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1969 0 3 3 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1970 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1971 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1972 1 4 5 20.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 4 8 12 33.3% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1973 2 1 3 66.7% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 0 1 100.0% 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1975 1 3 4 25.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1977 — — — — — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1978 — — — — — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1979 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 1982 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1983 — — — — — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 9 18 27 33.3% 49 54 103 47.6% 43 60 103 41.7% 15 22 37 40.5% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Wendy Gilchrist Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1968 1521 102.0 — — — — — +11 -7 50.0% -0.14 2–2 (50%) — — +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1969 1595 113.9 — — — — -44 -39 -69 44.7% -0.33 5–8 (38%) — — -1.03 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 1970 1654 123.0 — — — — — — -14 57.1% +0.47 2–2 (50%) — — +0.81 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1971 1763 124.5 — — — — -128 -159 +2 50.5% -0.44 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 108.8 -0.99 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 1972 1699 136.7 — — — — -93 -56 +13 42.7% -0.60 5–8 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 98.8 -5.77 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1973 1634 118.1 — — — — -1 +46 -37 42.3% -0.65 5–4 (56%) — — -0.76 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 1974 1623 114.0 — — — — -21 +54 -21 49.3% -0.03 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — +3.02 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 1975 1572 119.0 — — — — +10 +75 -20 48.4% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 +1.15 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 1976 1543 104.5 — — — — — — +8 31.6% -1.32 1–2 (33%) — — +0.95 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 1977 1503 104.4 — — — — — — -37 20.0% -1.90 0–2 1–1 — +0.29 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 1978 1502 109.9 — — — — — — -37 45.8% +0.13 1–1 1–1 — +1.14 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 1979 1483 99.2 — — — — — +105 — 40.0% -1.50 0–2 4–0 (100%) — +1.19 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 1980 1468 97.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.13 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 1982 1504 105.2 — — — — — +67 +16 52.6% +0.95 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +1.55 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
33 1983 1523 95.2 — — — — — — — 66.7% 0.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1769 123.1 — — — — -65 +4 -18 46.0% -0.36 44–47 (48%) 19–12 (61%) 105.9 +0.86 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.