H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Wendy Gilchrist vs Lesley Hunt H2H: 0-4
Lesley Hunt holds a 4–0 lead over Wendy Gilchrist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lesley Hunt leads 3–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1974 Australian Open second round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 1973 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 6-4 6-0 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Jun 29, 1973* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 6-3 6-2 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1972* | Albany | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lesley Hunt | 6-4 6-2 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Sep 9, 1971* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Lesley Hunt | 6-1 6-1 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Gilchrist | — | — | — | 1,764 | 135 | 167 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Gilchrist | Lesley Hunt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1969 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1970 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1972 | 21–31 | 40.4% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1973 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1974 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1975 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1977 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1978 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1982 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |