H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Wendy Gilchrist vs Margaret Court H2H: 0-4
Margaret Court holds a 4–0 lead over Wendy Gilchrist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Margaret Court leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Margaret Court won the 1972 London fourth round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 76
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 84
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 1972* | London | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Margaret Court | 7-5 6-1 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Oct 29, 1972* | Edingburgh | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Margaret Court | 6-0 6-1 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1972* | Newport | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Margaret Court | 6-1 6-1 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1972* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Margaret Court | 6-1 6-4 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Gilchrist | — | — | — | 1,764 | 135 | 167 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Margaret Court | — | — | — | 2,487 | 616 | 64 | 90.6% | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 78 | 95 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Gilchrist | Margaret Court | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 21–31 | 40.4% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 103–12 | 89.6% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 103–6 | 94.5% | — | 2,236 | 3 | 34 |
| 27 | 1977 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 114–6 | 95.0% | — | 2,350 | 7 | 56 |
| 28 | 1978 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 59–4 | 93.7% | — | 2,374 | 8 | 65 |
| 29 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,400 | 8 | 74 |
| 30 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 105–7 | 93.8% | — | 2,432 | 11 | 92 |
| 31 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 12–2 | 85.7% | — | 2,409 | 11 | 93 |
| 32 | 1982 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 40–13 | 75.5% | — | 2,250 | 11 | 94 |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 2,262 | 11 | 95 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 2,200 | 11 | 95 |