H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Wendy Gilchrist vs Mona Guerrant H2H: 2-1
Wendy Gilchrist holds a 2–1 lead over Mona Guerrant in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mona Guerrant leads 1–0 on carpet, while Wendy Gilchrist leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mona Guerrant won the 1973 Quincy fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 76
Left-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 77
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1973* | Quincy | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mona Guerrant | 6-3 6-4 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1971* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Wendy Gilchrist | 2-6 7-6 7-5 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1971* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Wendy Gilchrist | 7-6 7-6 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Gilchrist | — | — | — | 1,764 | 135 | 167 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Mona Guerrant | — | — | — | 1,939 | 123 | 117 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Gilchrist | Mona Guerrant | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 21–31 | 40.4% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1974 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 17–19 | 47.2% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1975 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1977 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,893 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1978 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,886 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 14–4 | 77.8% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1982 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |