H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Wendy Gilchrist vs Nell Truman H2H: 1-1
Wendy Gilchrist and Nell Truman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wendy Gilchrist leads 1–0 on clay, while Nell Truman leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nell Truman won the 1969 Wimbledon third round 3-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1969* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Nell Truman | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1969* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Wendy Gilchrist | 6-2 6-4 | Nell Truman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Gilchrist | — | — | — | 1,764 | 135 | 167 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Nell Truman | — | — | — | 1,763 | 112 | 106 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Gilchrist | Nell Truman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 21–31 | 40.4% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1973 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 24–23 | 51.1% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1974 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 26–31 | 45.6% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1975 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1977 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1982 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |