H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Wendy Gilchrist vs Rosie Casals H2H: 0-4
Rosie Casals holds a 4–0 lead over Wendy Gilchrist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rosie Casals leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rosie Casals won the 1973 Bethesda fourth round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 76
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 77
Right-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1973* | Bethesda | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Rosie Casals | 6-2 6-0 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Mar 26, 1972* | Richmond | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Rosie Casals | 6-7(4) 6-2 7-5 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Mar 3, 1972* | Rochester | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Rosie Casals | 6-1 6-3 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1970* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Rosie Casals | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Gilchrist | — | — | — | 1,764 | 135 | 167 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Rosie Casals | #207 | #55 | — | 2,203 | 594 | 322 | 64.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Gilchrist | Rosie Casals | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1970 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 42–19 | 68.9% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 52–21 | 71.2% | — | 2,035 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1972 | 21–31 | 40.4% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 92–31 | 74.8% | — | 2,162 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1973 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 2,098 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1974 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 81–28 | 74.3% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 12 |
| 25 | 1975 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 43–16 | 72.9% | — | 2,127 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1977 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 39–17 | 69.6% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1978 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 41–20 | 67.2% | — | 2,044 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 24–15 | 61.5% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 19–26 | 42.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 14–25 | 35.9% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 1982 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #172 | 1,610 | 0 | 12 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 12 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 12 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 12 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 12 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 12 |