H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Wendy Gilchrist vs Wendy Overton H2H: 0-3
Wendy Overton holds a 3–0 lead over Wendy Gilchrist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Wendy Overton leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wendy Overton won the 1972 Boca Raton fourth round 6-0 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1972* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Wendy Overton | 6-0 5-7 6-2 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Oct 1, 1972* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Wendy Overton | 6-2 7-5 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Sep 15, 1972* | Charlotte | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Wendy Overton | 6-0 7-5 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Gilchrist | — | — | — | 1,764 | 135 | 167 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Wendy Overton | — | — | — | 1,920 | 123 | 142 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Gilchrist | Wendy Overton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 21–31 | 40.4% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1974 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1975 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 40–30 | 57.1% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 14–23 | 37.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1977 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1978 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1982 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |