H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Wendy Gilchrist vs Winnie Shaw H2H: 0-3
Winnie Shaw holds a 3–0 lead over Wendy Gilchrist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Winnie Shaw leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1970 Johannesburg third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 1970* | Johannesburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Winnie Shaw | 6-4 6-2 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Jan 28, 1970* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-1 6-3 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
| Jul 12, 1969* | Newport Wales | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-3 6-4 | Wendy Gilchrist | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Gilchrist | — | — | — | 1,764 | 135 | 167 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Gilchrist | Winnie Shaw | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1972 | 21–31 | 40.4% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1973 | 13–18 | 41.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1974 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1975 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1977 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1978 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | 1982 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |