H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Wendy Overton vs Corinne Molesworth H2H: 2-1
Wendy Overton holds a 2–1 lead over Corinne Molesworth in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Wendy Overton leads 2–0 on grass, while Corinne Molesworth leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wendy Overton won the 1972 Newport fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1972* | Newport | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Wendy Overton | 7-5 6-3 | Corinne Molesworth | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1972* | Queens Club | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Wendy Overton | 6-1 6-3 | Corinne Molesworth | Match data |
| Mar 24, 1972* | Richmond | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Corinne Molesworth | 6-7 6-1 6-2 | Wendy Overton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Overton | — | — | — | 1,920 | 123 | 142 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Corinne Molesworth | — | — | — | 1,782 | 219 | 183 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Overton | Corinne Molesworth | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 27–21 | 56.2% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1968 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 38–31 | 55.1% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1969 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 18–24 | 42.9% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1970 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 27–27 | 50.0% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1972 | 40–30 | 57.1% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 15–11 | 57.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1973 | 14–23 | 37.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1974 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1975 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1976 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 21–9 | 70.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1977 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 17–7 | 70.8% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |