H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Wendy Overton vs Kristien Shaw H2H: 3-1
Wendy Overton holds a 3–1 lead over Kristien Shaw in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Wendy Overton leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kristien Shaw won the 1977 Seattle fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1977* | Seattle | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Kristien Shaw | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Wendy Overton | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1976* | Westchester | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Wendy Overton | 7-5 3-6 6-2 | Kristien Shaw | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1974* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Wendy Overton | 6-1 6-1 | Kristien Shaw | Match data |
| May 7, 1972* | Indianapolis Indoors | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Wendy Overton | 6-3 6-3 | Kristien Shaw | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Overton | — | — | — | 1,920 | 123 | 142 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kristien Shaw | — | — | — | 1,929 | 119 | 141 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Overton | Kristien Shaw | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 12–10 | 54.5% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 23–25 | 47.9% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–13 | 13.3% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 29–24 | 54.7% | — | 1,913 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1968 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1969 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,802 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1970 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,834 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1972 | 40–30 | 57.1% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1973 | 14–23 | 37.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |