H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Wendy Overton vs Laurie Fleming H2H: 1-1
Wendy Overton and Laurie Fleming are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laurie Fleming leads 1–0 on carpet, while Wendy Overton leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wendy Overton won the 1975 Orlando third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1975* | Orlando | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Wendy Overton | 6-2 6-1 | Laurie Fleming | Match data |
| Jan 28, 1974 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Laurie Fleming | 6-3 6-2 | Wendy Overton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Overton | — | — | — | 1,920 | 123 | 142 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laurie Fleming | — | — | — | 1,770 | 41 | 50 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Overton | Laurie Fleming | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 15–5 | 75.0% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1968 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1972 | 40–30 | 57.1% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 14–23 | 37.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |