H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Wendy Turnbull vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 0-2
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 2–0 lead over Wendy Turnbull in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1985 Virginia Slims Championships fourth round 3-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1985 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Carpet | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1985* | Princeton | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-2 6-2 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Turnbull | #346 | #3 | 38 | 2,181 | 585 | 330 | 63.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 18 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Wendy Turnbull | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1973 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1974 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1976 | 27–21 | 56.2% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1977 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 2,064 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1979 | 62–27 | 69.7% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 12 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1980 | 69–26 | 72.6% | — | 2,135 | 0 | 14 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1981 | 45–23 | 66.2% | — | 2,050 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 2,070 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #5 | 2,022 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,960 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,864 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,779 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #135 | 1,651 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,631 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |