H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Wendy Turnbull vs Kim Jones H2H: 1-0

Wendy Turnbull holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wendy Turnbull leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Wendy Turnbull won the 1984 Houston round of 16 6-2 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wendy Turnbull
AUS Age 73 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kim Jones
USA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Wendy Turnbull #12 6-2 3-6 6-3 Kim Jones Match data Feb 3, 1984* R16 Houston WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Wendy Turnbull — #3 38 2,207 586 331 63.9% 0 0 0 2 16 18
Kim Jones — — — 1,801 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wendy Turnbull Kim Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 0–3 0.0% — 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 1–3 25.0% — 1,452 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1972 24–13 64.9% — 1,650 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 1973 33–20 62.3% — 1,738 0 7 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
21 1974 16–14 53.3% — 1,644 0 7 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
22 1975 13–15 46.4% — 1,714 0 7 1980 1–10 9.1% — 1,423 0 0
23 1976 27–21 56.2% — 1,851 0 10 1981 6–13 31.6% — 1,459 0 0
24 1977 31–20 60.8% #9 2,060 0 10 1982 4–14 22.2% — 1,483 0 0
25 1978 54–23 70.1% #7 2,083 0 10 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,758 0 1
26 1979 62–27 69.7% #7 2,076 0 12 1984 13–24 35.1% — 1,667 0 1
27 1980 69–26 72.6% #8 2,164 0 14 1985 13–18 41.9% — 1,725 0 1
28 1981 45–23 66.2% #8 2,065 0 15 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,677 0 1
29 1982 47–20 70.1% #5 2,077 0 17 1987 0–4 0.0% — 1,629 0 1
30 1983 47–18 72.3% #8 2,068 0 18 — — — — — — —
31 1984 37–16 69.8% #5 2,024 0 18 — — — — — — —
32 1985 36–18 66.7% — 1,961 0 18 — — — — — — —
33 1986 17–15 53.1% #18 1,865 0 18 — — — — — — —
34 1987 20–16 55.6% #23 1,780 0 18 — — — — — — —
35 1988 5–14 26.3% #135 1,639 0 18 — — — — — — —
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #266 1,622 0 18 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Wendy Turnbull Kim Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1968 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1973 3 2 5 60.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 18 7 25 72.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1975 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1977 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
25 1978 14 7 21 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 4 18 77.8% 25 11 36 69.4% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 1979 16 8 24 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 27 11 38 71.1% 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 18 4 22 81.8% 29 15 44 65.9% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 19 11 30 63.3% 1986 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 30 11 41 73.2% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
30 1983 7 4 11 63.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 15 4 19 78.9% 20 7 27 74.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — 15 6 21 71.4% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — 15 6 21 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 8 6 14 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 115 78 193 59.6% 77 47 124 62.1% 186 96 282 66.0% 201 106 307 65.5% — 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Wendy Turnbull Kim Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1968 1490 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 1476 89.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1454 105.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 1453 98.8 — — — — — — +19 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 1650 124.5 — — — — — -58 -2 60.0% +0.91 8–2 (80%) 0–1 — +3.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1973 1738 139.1 — — — — -99 -118 +75 60.9% +0.99 7–8 (47%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 +3.22 1978 1506 102.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.08
21 1974 1645 119.8 — — — — +2 -49 +127 52.3% +0.51 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +3.34 1979 1490 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.09
22 1975 1715 131.7 — — — — -30 — +63 43.1% -0.29 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.8 -0.99 1980 1423 94.6 — — — — +38 — — 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.48
23 1976 1851 143.1 — — — — -104 -78 -31 55.0% +0.31 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 105.1 -1.37 1981 1459 107.5 — — — — +44 +75 — 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +1.57
24 1977 2061 166.9 — — — — -154 -122 -149 59.8% +0.78 5–4 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 105.8 -9.04 1982 1484 104.0 — — — — -68 -7 +112 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.61
25 1978 2084 163.9 — — — — +22 — -47 64.6% +0.91 18–9 (67%) 16–7 (70%) 107.6 -6.19 1983 1758 132.1 — — — — -40 — -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.44
26 1979 2077 164.0 — — — — +12 -121 -3 65.3% +1.01 17–8 (68%) 6–4 (60%) 104.0 -4.02 1984 1668 132.8 — — — — +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.14
27 1980 2165 163.8 — — — — -55 -151 +63 68.0% +1.20 15–2 (88%) 6–9 (40%) 104.3 -7.62 1985 1725 135.7 — — — — -9 — -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.50
28 1981 2065 155.8 — — — — -105 -34 +172 63.3% +0.83 11–5 (69%) 6–8 (43%) 99.6 -3.37 1986 1678 104.5 — — — — -13 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.69
29 1982 2077 169.6 — — — — +6 -44 +109 67.6% +1.66 10–8 (56%) 7–10 (41%) 96.2 -2.48 1987 1630 104.2 — — — — -23 — — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.20
30 1983 2069 164.0 — — — — +9 -50 +162 66.4% +1.32 12–7 (63%) 7–6 (54%) 100.7 -4.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 2025 155.3 — — — — +50 — +123 65.3% +1.29 9–5 (64%) 3–7 (30%) 94.7 -1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1962 150.0 — — — — -13 — +150 65.3% +1.14 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 92.9 +1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 1866 143.6 — — — — +19 +128 +179 50.7% +0.15 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 -2.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 1780 134.3 — — — — +32 — +179 55.7% +0.58 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 99.0 +1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 1640 119.3 — — — — +32 — +195 32.6% -1.41 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 93.5 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1622 104.9 — — — — +4 — — 40.0% -0.70 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2207 159.6 — — — — -18 -83 +72 60.9% +0.84 152–89 (63%) 81–83 (49%) 102.0 -3.53 — 1801 126.5 — — — — -6 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.