H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Wendy Turnbull vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 4-1
Wendy Turnbull holds a 4–1 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Wendy Turnbull leads 2–1 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1987 Princeton quarterfinal 4-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1987* | Princeton | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Lori Mcneil | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Jan 10, 1987* | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Wendy Turnbull | 6-4 7-5 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Feb 22, 1985* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | 6-1 6-1 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Nov 22, 1984* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Wendy Turnbull | 6-1 6-1 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1984* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | 6-4 6-2 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Turnbull | #346 | #3 | 38 | 2,181 | 585 | 330 | 63.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 18 |
| Lori Mcneil | #867 | #9 | 303 | 2,032 | 377 | 273 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Turnbull | Lori Mcneil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1972 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1973 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 7 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1974 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1975 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1976 | 27–21 | 56.2% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,017 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1977 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,904 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1978 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 2,064 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1979 | 62–27 | 69.7% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 12 | 1990 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1980 | 69–26 | 72.6% | — | 2,135 | 0 | 14 | 1991 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,870 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1981 | 45–23 | 66.2% | — | 2,050 | 0 | 15 | 1992 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #15 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1982 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 2,070 | 0 | 17 | 1993 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 18 | 1994 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 1984 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #5 | 2,022 | 0 | 18 | 1995 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 1985 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,960 | 0 | 18 | 1996 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | 1986 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,864 | 0 | 18 | 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #301 | 1,655 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,779 | 0 | 18 | 1998 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #91 | 1,717 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #135 | 1,651 | 0 | 18 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #869 | 1,669 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,631 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |