H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Wendy Turnbull vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 5-4

Wendy Turnbull holds a 5–4 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Wendy Turnbull leads 5–2 on carpet, while Mima Jausovec leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Wendy Turnbull won the 1982 WTA Finals quarterfinal 6-1 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wendy Turnbull
AUS Age 73 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5 – 4
9 main-draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Wendy Turnbull 6-1 3-6 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Mar 24, 1982 QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-3 7-6 Wendy Turnbull Match data Mar 21, 1981* QF Boston WTA 250 Carpet
Wendy Turnbull 7-6 7-5 Mima Jausovec Match data Feb 14, 1981* QF Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Wendy Turnbull 6-4 6-4 Mima Jausovec Match data Jan 25, 1980* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Wendy Turnbull 6-2 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Feb 24, 1979* QF Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 8-6 4-6 6-3 Wendy Turnbull Match data Jul 5, 1978* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Wendy Turnbull 6-1 6-3 Mima Jausovec Match data Mar 3, 1978* R16 Kansas City WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-4 6-3 Wendy Turnbull Match data Jun 24, 1977* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Mima Jausovec 7-5 6-1 Wendy Turnbull Match data Jan 28, 1977* R16 Minneapolis WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Wendy Turnbull — #3 38 2,207 586 331 63.9% 0 0 0 2 16 18
Mima Jausovec — #23 2 2,092 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wendy Turnbull Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1970 0–3 0.0% — 1,453 0 0 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1
18 1971 1–3 25.0% — 1,452 0 0 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1
19 1972 24–13 64.9% — 1,650 0 4 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,006 0 4
20 1973 33–20 62.3% — 1,738 0 7 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5
21 1974 16–14 53.3% — 1,644 0 7 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6
22 1975 13–15 46.4% — 1,714 0 7 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,872 1 6
23 1976 27–21 56.2% — 1,851 0 10 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,947 1 6
24 1977 31–20 60.8% #9 2,060 0 10 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,015 1 6
25 1978 54–23 70.1% #7 2,083 0 10 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,859 1 7
26 1979 62–27 69.7% #7 2,076 0 12 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,874 1 7
27 1980 69–26 72.6% #8 2,164 0 14 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,748 1 7
28 1981 45–23 66.2% #8 2,065 0 15 1985 9–12 42.9% — 1,695 1 7
29 1982 47–20 70.1% #5 2,077 0 17 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 1983 47–18 72.3% #8 2,068 0 18 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 1984 37–16 69.8% #5 2,024 0 18 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7
32 1985 36–18 66.7% — 1,961 0 18 — — — — — — —
33 1986 17–15 53.1% #18 1,865 0 18 — — — — — — —
34 1987 20–16 55.6% #23 1,780 0 18 — — — — — — —
35 1988 5–14 26.3% #135 1,639 0 18 — — — — — — —
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #266 1,622 0 18 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Wendy Turnbull Mima Jausovec
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1968 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1970 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1971 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2%
19 1972 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5% — — — — 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
20 1973 3 2 5 60.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 18 7 25 72.0% — — — — 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6%
21 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
22 1975 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
23 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
24 1977 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 1978 14 7 21 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 4 18 77.8% 25 11 36 69.4% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 1979 16 8 24 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 27 11 38 71.1% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 18 4 22 81.8% 29 15 44 65.9% 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 19 11 30 63.3% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 30 11 41 73.2% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1983 7 4 11 63.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 15 4 19 78.9% 20 7 27 74.1% 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1984 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — 15 6 21 71.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
32 1985 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — 15 6 21 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 8 6 14 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 115 78 193 59.6% 77 47 124 62.1% 186 96 282 66.0% 201 106 307 65.5% — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Wendy Turnbull Mima Jausovec
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1968 1490 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.15 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55
16 1969 1476 89.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.17 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.17
17 1970 1454 105.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -2.15
18 1971 1453 98.8 — — — — — — +19 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — +0.09 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -2.20
19 1972 1650 124.5 — — — — — -58 -2 60.0% +0.91 8–2 (80%) 0–1 — +3.16 1976 2006 156.7 — — — — -269 +59 -235 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -4.08
20 1973 1738 139.1 — — — — -99 -118 +75 60.9% +0.99 7–8 (47%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 +3.22 1977 2011 161.8 — — — — -204 +129 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.46
21 1974 1645 119.8 — — — — +2 -49 +127 52.3% +0.51 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +3.34 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -139 +160 -130 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -4.09
22 1975 1715 131.7 — — — — -30 — +63 43.1% -0.29 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.8 -0.99 1979 1873 146.6 — — — — -11 +165 -111 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.9 +0.01
23 1976 1851 143.1 — — — — -104 -78 -31 55.0% +0.31 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 105.1 -1.37 1980 1947 156.3 — — — — +4 +49 -112 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.84
24 1977 2061 166.9 — — — — -154 -122 -149 59.8% +0.78 5–4 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 105.8 -9.04 1981 2015 157.3 — — — — -1 +4 -104 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.23
25 1978 2084 163.9 — — — — +22 — -47 64.6% +0.91 18–9 (67%) 16–7 (70%) 107.6 -6.19 1982 1859 148.8 — — — — +114 +111 -67 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 +1.20
26 1979 2077 164.0 — — — — +12 -121 -3 65.3% +1.01 17–8 (68%) 6–4 (60%) 104.0 -4.02 1983 1875 144.0 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.60
27 1980 2165 163.8 — — — — -55 -151 +63 68.0% +1.20 15–2 (88%) 6–9 (40%) 104.3 -7.62 1984 1748 131.8 — — — — -26 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.24
28 1981 2065 155.8 — — — — -105 -34 +172 63.3% +0.83 11–5 (69%) 6–8 (43%) 99.6 -3.37 1985 1696 127.7 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.55
29 1982 2077 169.6 — — — — +6 -44 +109 67.6% +1.66 10–8 (56%) 7–10 (41%) 96.2 -2.48 1986 1674 105.7 — — — — — +196 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.21
30 1983 2069 164.0 — — — — +9 -50 +162 66.4% +1.32 12–7 (63%) 7–6 (54%) 100.7 -4.25 1987 1657 107.2 — — — — — +178 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.39
31 1984 2025 155.3 — — — — +50 — +123 65.3% +1.29 9–5 (64%) 3–7 (30%) 94.7 -1.27 1988 1642 110.1 — — — — — +161 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77
32 1985 1962 150.0 — — — — -13 — +150 65.3% +1.14 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 92.9 +1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 1866 143.6 — — — — +19 +128 +179 50.7% +0.15 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 -2.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 1780 134.3 — — — — +32 — +179 55.7% +0.58 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 99.0 +1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 1640 119.3 — — — — +32 — +195 32.6% -1.41 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 93.5 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1622 104.9 — — — — +4 — — 40.0% -0.70 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2207 159.6 — — — — -18 -83 +72 60.9% +0.84 152–89 (63%) 81–83 (49%) 102.0 -3.53 — 2093 156.2 — — — — -46 +105 -120 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -4.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.