H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Wendy Turnbull vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 4-1 (incl. walkovers)

Wendy Turnbull vs Pam Teeguarden: 4–0 excluding walkovers; 4–1 including 1 walkover. Across 5 main-draw results including walkovers, Wendy Turnbull leads 3–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Wendy Turnbull won the 1981 Minneapolis round of 16 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wendy Turnbull
AUS Age 73 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H including walkovers
4 – 1
5 main-draw results
Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Wendy Turnbull 6-4 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Oct 2, 1981* R16 Minneapolis WTA 250 Carpet
Wendy Turnbull 6-4 6-1 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jul 1, 1981* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Wendy Turnbull 1-6 6-4 6-2 Pam Teeguarden Match data Oct 2, 1980* R32 Minneapolis WTA 250 Carpet
Wendy Turnbull 6-3 7-5 Pam Teeguarden Match data Sep 28, 1978* R32 Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Teeguarden (w/o) Wendy Turnbull Match data Nov 18, 1977* R16 Sydney WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Wendy Turnbull #346 #3 38 2,205 586 331 63.9% 0 0 0 2 16 18
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wendy Turnbull Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 0–3 0.0% — 1,453 0 0 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0
18 1971 1–3 25.0% — 1,452 0 0 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0
19 1972 24–13 64.9% — 1,650 0 4 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1
20 1973 33–20 62.3% — 1,738 0 7 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1
21 1974 16–14 53.3% — 1,644 0 7 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1
22 1975 13–15 46.4% — 1,714 0 7 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1
23 1976 27–21 56.2% — 1,850 0 10 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3
24 1977 31–20 60.8% #9 2,058 0 10 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3
25 1978 54–23 70.1% #7 2,079 0 10 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3
26 1979 62–27 69.7% #7 2,075 0 12 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3
27 1980 69–26 72.6% #8 2,163 0 14 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3
28 1981 45–23 66.2% #8 2,063 0 15 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3
29 1982 47–20 70.1% #5 2,075 0 17 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3
30 1983 47–18 72.3% #8 2,067 0 18 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4
31 1984 37–16 69.8% #5 2,023 0 18 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4
32 1985 36–18 66.7% #5 1,960 0 18 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4
33 1986 17–15 53.1% #18 1,865 0 18 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4
34 1987 20–16 55.6% #23 1,779 0 18 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4
35 1988 5–14 26.3% #135 1,639 0 18 — — — — — — —
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #266 1,621 0 18 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Wendy Turnbull Pam Teeguarden
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1968 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
18 1971 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
19 1972 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5% — — — — 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1973 3 2 5 60.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 18 7 25 72.0% — — — — 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0%
22 1975 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1977 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1%
25 1978 14 7 21 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 4 18 77.8% 25 11 36 69.4% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 1979 16 8 24 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 27 11 38 71.1% 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 18 4 22 81.8% 29 15 44 65.9% 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
28 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 19 11 30 63.3% 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0%
29 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 30 11 41 73.2% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
30 1983 7 4 11 63.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 15 4 19 78.9% 20 7 27 74.1% 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
31 1984 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — 15 6 21 71.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 1985 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — 15 6 21 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 1986 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 1987 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 8 6 14 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5% 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
35 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 115 78 193 59.6% 77 47 124 62.1% 186 96 282 66.0% 201 106 307 65.5% — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Wendy Turnbull Pam Teeguarden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1968 1490 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 1476 89.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1454 105.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27
18 1971 1453 98.8 — — — — — — +19 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — +0.09 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40
19 1972 1650 124.5 — — — — — -58 -2 60.0% +0.91 8–2 (80%) 0–1 — +3.16 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45
20 1973 1738 139.1 — — — — -99 -118 +75 60.9% +0.99 7–8 (47%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 +3.43 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97
21 1974 1645 119.8 — — — — +2 -49 +127 52.3% +0.51 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +3.51 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18
22 1975 1715 131.6 — — — — -30 — +63 43.1% -0.29 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.8 -1.73 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05
23 1976 1850 143.0 — — — — -103 -77 -31 55.0% +0.31 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 105.1 -1.30 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34
24 1977 2058 166.6 — — — — -153 -120 -145 59.8% +0.78 5–4 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 105.8 -9.04 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08
25 1978 2080 163.3 — — — — +20 — -42 64.8% +0.91 17–9 (65%) 16–7 (70%) 106.9 -6.33 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53
26 1979 2075 163.7 — — — — +11 -120 -1 65.3% +1.01 17–8 (68%) 6–4 (60%) 104.1 -4.20 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44
27 1980 2163 163.4 — — — — -58 -151 +64 68.0% +1.20 15–2 (88%) 6–9 (40%) 104.3 -7.21 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11
28 1981 2063 155.6 — — — — -104 -33 +172 63.3% +0.83 11–5 (69%) 6–8 (43%) 99.6 -3.24 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56
29 1982 2076 169.3 — — — — +6 -45 +110 67.6% +1.66 10–8 (56%) 7–10 (41%) 96.2 -2.11 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72
30 1983 2068 163.8 — — — — +8 -50 +163 66.4% +1.32 12–7 (63%) 7–6 (54%) 100.7 -3.86 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17
31 1984 2024 155.1 — — — — +50 — +122 65.3% +1.29 9–5 (64%) 3–7 (30%) 94.7 -1.28 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19
32 1985 1961 149.9 — — — — -12 — +150 65.3% +1.14 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 92.9 +1.31 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80
33 1986 1865 143.4 — — — — +19 +129 +179 50.7% +0.15 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 -2.24 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32
34 1987 1780 134.1 — — — — +31 — +180 55.7% +0.58 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 99.0 +1.11 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53
35 1988 1639 119.2 — — — — +33 — +195 32.6% -1.41 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 93.5 -1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1622 104.9 — — — — +4 — — 40.0% -0.70 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2206 159.4 — — — — -18 -82 +72 60.9% +0.84 151–89 (63%) 81–83 (49%) 101.9 -3.44 — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.