H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Wendy Turnbull vs Regina Marsikova H2H: 5-2

Wendy Turnbull holds a 5–2 lead over Regina Marsikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Wendy Turnbull leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Regina Marsikova won the 1981 Orlando quarterfinal 6-7 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wendy Turnbull
AUS Age 73 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main-draw meetings
Regina Marsikova
CZE Age 67

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Regina Marsikova 6-7 6-0 6-2 Wendy Turnbull Match data May 2, 1981* QF Orlando WTA 250 Clay
Regina Marsikova 7-6 7-6 Wendy Turnbull Match data Oct 12, 1980* F Phoenix WTA 250 Hard
Wendy Turnbull 6-2 6-0 Regina Marsikova Match data Nov 29, 1979* R32 Melbourne WTA 250 Grass
Wendy Turnbull 6-4 6-3 Regina Marsikova Match data Jun 9, 1979* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Wendy Turnbull 6-3 6-2 Regina Marsikova Match data Feb 22, 1979* R32 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Wendy Turnbull 7-5 6-4 Regina Marsikova Match data Nov 13, 1978 RR Colgate Series Championships WTA Finals Hard
Wendy Turnbull 4-6 6-1 6-3 Regina Marsikova Match data Feb 23, 1978* R32 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Wendy Turnbull #346 #3 38 2,205 586 331 63.9% 0 0 0 2 16 18
Regina Marsikova — — — 2,034 266 198 57.3% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wendy Turnbull Regina Marsikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0 1975 5–5 50.0% — 1,581 0 0
17 1970 0–3 0.0% — 1,453 0 0 1976 17–15 53.1% — 1,748 0 1
18 1971 1–3 25.0% — 1,452 0 0 1977 37–17 68.5% — 1,909 0 8
19 1972 24–13 64.9% — 1,650 0 4 1978 56–30 65.1% — 1,953 0 12
20 1973 33–20 62.3% — 1,738 0 7 1979 38–24 61.3% — 1,937 0 12
21 1974 16–14 53.3% — 1,644 0 7 1980 33–22 60.0% — 1,899 0 14
22 1975 13–15 46.4% — 1,714 0 7 1981 34–16 68.0% — 1,996 0 15
23 1976 27–21 56.2% — 1,850 0 10 — — — — — — —
24 1977 31–20 60.8% #9 2,058 0 10 — — — — — — —
25 1978 54–23 70.1% #7 2,079 0 10 — — — — — — —
26 1979 62–27 69.7% #7 2,075 0 12 1985 12–16 42.9% — 1,763 0 15
27 1980 69–26 72.6% #8 2,163 0 14 1986 15–19 44.1% — 1,719 0 15
28 1981 45–23 66.2% #8 2,063 0 15 1987 14–19 42.4% — 1,672 0 15
29 1982 47–20 70.1% #5 2,075 0 17 1988 4–7 36.4% — 1,605 0 15
30 1983 47–18 72.3% #8 2,067 0 18 1989 1–6 14.3% — 1,540 0 15
31 1984 37–16 69.8% #5 2,023 0 18 — — — — — — —
32 1985 36–18 66.7% #5 1,960 0 18 — — — — — — —
33 1986 17–15 53.1% #18 1,865 0 18 — — — — — — —
34 1987 20–16 55.6% #23 1,779 0 18 — — — — — — —
35 1988 5–14 26.3% #135 1,639 0 18 — — — — — — —
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #266 1,621 0 18 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Wendy Turnbull Regina Marsikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1968 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1970 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1976 — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
18 1971 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1972 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5% — — — — 1978 17 10 27 63.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 11 16 31.3%
20 1973 3 2 5 60.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 18 7 25 72.0% — — — — 1979 12 7 19 63.2% 17 7 24 70.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
21 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 1980 15 7 22 68.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
22 1975 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1981 8 4 12 66.7% 25 9 34 73.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 9 5 14 64.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 14 7 21 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 4 18 77.8% 25 11 36 69.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 16 8 24 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 27 11 38 71.1% 1985 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 18 4 22 81.8% 29 15 44 65.9% 1986 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 19 11 30 63.3% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 30 11 41 73.2% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1983 7 4 11 63.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 15 4 19 78.9% 20 7 27 74.1% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
31 1984 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — 15 6 21 71.4% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — 15 6 21 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 8 6 14 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 115 78 193 59.6% 77 47 124 62.1% 186 96 282 66.0% 201 106 307 65.5% — 65 49 114 57.0% 144 74 218 66.1% 32 28 60 53.3% 24 46 70 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Wendy Turnbull Regina Marsikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1968 1490 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.15 1974 1500 116.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.30
16 1969 1476 89.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.17 1975 1582 125.6 — — — — +75 +3 — 50.0% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — +0.09
17 1970 1454 105.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06 1976 1748 142.4 — — — — -178 +62 -176 51.3% +0.34 7–7 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 97.4 -1.38
18 1971 1453 98.8 — — — — — — +19 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — +0.09 1977 1909 143.6 — — — — -347 +113 -243 62.5% +0.85 14–6 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 108.8 +1.24
19 1972 1650 124.5 — — — — — -58 -2 60.0% +0.91 8–2 (80%) 0–1 — +3.16 1978 1953 157.8 — — — — -98 +117 -133 64.0% +0.95 12–9 (57%) 8–6 (57%) 108.5 -6.24
20 1973 1738 139.1 — — — — -99 -118 +75 60.9% +0.99 7–8 (47%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 +3.43 1979 1937 147.6 — — — — -80 +154 -90 60.4% +0.53 11–8 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 -2.91
21 1974 1645 119.8 — — — — +2 -49 +127 52.3% +0.51 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +3.51 1980 1899 147.5 — — — — -23 +194 — 56.1% +0.38 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -6.21
22 1975 1715 131.6 — — — — -30 — +63 43.1% -0.29 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.8 -1.73 1981 1997 159.3 — — — — -116 +182 — 63.3% +0.90 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 103.0 -6.03
23 1976 1850 143.0 — — — — -103 -77 -31 55.0% +0.31 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 105.1 -1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 2058 166.6 — — — — -153 -120 -145 59.8% +0.78 5–4 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 105.8 -9.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 2080 163.3 — — — — +20 — -42 64.8% +0.91 17–9 (65%) 16–7 (70%) 106.9 -6.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 2075 163.7 — — — — +11 -120 -1 65.3% +1.01 17–8 (68%) 6–4 (60%) 104.1 -4.20 1985 1764 131.5 — — — — +4 +295 -77 49.2% -0.07 0–5 (0%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -2.30
27 1980 2163 163.4 — — — — -58 -151 +64 68.0% +1.20 15–2 (88%) 6–9 (40%) 104.3 -7.21 1986 1720 126.9 — — — — +1 +191 — 41.8% -0.58 8–3 (73%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -2.11
28 1981 2063 155.6 — — — — -104 -33 +172 63.3% +0.83 11–5 (69%) 6–8 (43%) 99.6 -3.24 1987 1672 129.0 — — — — +36 +92 -19 46.1% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -2.58
29 1982 2076 169.3 — — — — +6 -45 +110 67.6% +1.66 10–8 (56%) 7–10 (41%) 96.2 -2.11 1988 1606 99.5 — — — — — +87 — 33.3% -2.00 2–0 1–0 — +0.61
30 1983 2068 163.8 — — — — +8 -50 +163 66.4% +1.32 12–7 (63%) 7–6 (54%) 100.7 -3.86 1989 1541 97.0 — — — — — +71 — 14.3% -2.21 — 0–1 — +0.28
31 1984 2024 155.1 — — — — +50 — +122 65.3% +1.29 9–5 (64%) 3–7 (30%) 94.7 -1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1961 149.9 — — — — -12 — +150 65.3% +1.14 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 92.9 +1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 1865 143.4 — — — — +19 +129 +179 50.7% +0.15 6–3 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 -2.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 1780 134.1 — — — — +31 — +180 55.7% +0.58 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 99.0 +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 1639 119.2 — — — — +33 — +195 32.6% -1.41 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 93.5 -1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1622 104.9 — — — — +4 — — 40.0% -0.70 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2206 159.4 — — — — -18 -82 +72 60.9% +0.84 151–89 (63%) 81–83 (49%) 101.9 -3.44 — 2034 150.4 — — — — -68 +139 -140 55.7% +0.35 80–57 (58%) 50–42 (54%) 107.3 -6.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.