H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Wendy Turnbull vs Sharon Walsh Pete H2H: 8-3
Wendy Turnbull holds a 8–3 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet, while Wendy Turnbull leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Sharon Walsh Pete won the 1987 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
8
–
3
11 main draw meetings
Age 74
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Sharon Walsh Pete | 6-4 6-4 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Dec 7, 1984* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Wendy Turnbull | 7-5 6-2 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
| Jan 12, 1984* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sharon Walsh Pete | 6-3 1-6 6-2 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Wendy Turnbull | 6-3 6-3 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
| Aug 26, 1982* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Wendy Turnbull | 6-2 6-1 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1980* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Wendy Turnbull | 6-2 6-1 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1979* | Tokyo Sillook | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Wendy Turnbull | 6-2 7-5 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
| Feb 8, 1979* | Seattle | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | 2-6 6-4 7-6(4) | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
| Dec 8, 1978* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Wendy Turnbull | 6-1 6-1 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1978* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | 6-3 6-4 | Sharon Walsh Pete | Match data |
| Sep 25, 1975* | Denver | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sharon Walsh Pete | 6-3 4-6 7-6 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Turnbull | #346 | #3 | 38 | 2,181 | 585 | 330 | 63.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 18 |
| Sharon Walsh Pete | — | — | — | 1,894 | 300 | 340 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Turnbull | Sharon Walsh Pete | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 32–16 | 66.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1972 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1973 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 32–27 | 54.2% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1974 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 37–33 | 52.9% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1975 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1976 | 27–21 | 56.2% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 9–25 | 26.5% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1977 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1978 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 2,064 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1979 | 62–27 | 69.7% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 12 | 1978 | 15–27 | 35.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1980 | 69–26 | 72.6% | — | 2,135 | 0 | 14 | 1979 | 14–22 | 38.9% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1981 | 45–23 | 66.2% | — | 2,050 | 0 | 15 | 1980 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1982 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 2,070 | 0 | 17 | 1981 | 25–17 | 59.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 18 | 1982 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 1984 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #5 | 2,022 | 0 | 18 | 1983 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 1985 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,960 | 0 | 18 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1986 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,864 | 0 | 18 | 1985 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,779 | 0 | 18 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #135 | 1,651 | 0 | 18 | 1987 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,631 | 0 | 18 | 1988 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 8 |