H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Wendy Turnbull vs Sylvia Hanika H2H: 7-4
Wendy Turnbull holds a 7–4 lead over Sylvia Hanika in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Wendy Turnbull leads 5–3 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1987 San Francisco quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
7
–
4
11 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 1987* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Sylvia Hanika | 6-4 6-1 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Oct 1, 1983* | Hartford | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Sylvia Hanika | 6-7 6-2 6-0 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Jul 28, 1983 | Sydney Indoors | WTA 250 | RR | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | 6-3 6-4 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1983* | Boston | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
| Feb 26, 1983* | Oakland | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Sylvia Hanika | 6-0 4-6 6-4 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Mar 24, 1982 | Avon Championships | WTA Finals | SF | Carpet | Sylvia Hanika | 6-1 2-6 7-6(2) | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Jan 23, 1982* | Seattle | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | 6-3 6-2 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1980* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | 7-6 6-1 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
| Jan 26, 1980* | Chicago | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | 7-6 3-6 6-1 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1979* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Wendy Turnbull | 6-3 6-3 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
| Dec 9, 1978* | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Wendy Turnbull | 6-2 6-2 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Turnbull | #346 | #3 | 38 | 2,181 | 585 | 330 | 63.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 18 |
| Sylvia Hanika | #223 | #6 | 48 | 2,137 | 414 | 238 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Turnbull | Sylvia Hanika | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1972 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,945 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1973 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1974 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1975 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1976 | 27–21 | 56.2% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | — | 1,966 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1977 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 10 | 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,878 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1978 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 2,064 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,859 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1979 | 62–27 | 69.7% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 12 | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,790 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1980 | 69–26 | 72.6% | — | 2,135 | 0 | 14 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1981 | 45–23 | 66.2% | — | 2,050 | 0 | 15 | 1988 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1982 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 2,070 | 0 | 17 | 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,807 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 18 | 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,703 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1984 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #5 | 2,022 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1985 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,960 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1986 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,864 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,779 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #135 | 1,651 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,631 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |