H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Wendy Turnbull vs Veronica Burton H2H: 2-1
Wendy Turnbull holds a 2–1 lead over Veronica Burton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Wendy Turnbull leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Veronica Burton won the 1973 Indianapolis fourth round 3-6 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 74
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1973* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Veronica Burton | 3-6 6-0 6-3 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1972* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Wendy Turnbull | 8-6 4-6 11-9 | Veronica Burton | Match data |
| Apr 29, 1972* | Norwich | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Wendy Turnbull | 6-4 6-2 | Veronica Burton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Turnbull | #346 | #3 | 38 | 2,181 | 585 | 330 | 63.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 18 |
| Veronica Burton | — | — | — | 1,832 | 139 | 131 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Turnbull | Veronica Burton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1974 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 39–20 | 66.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1975 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1976 | 27–21 | 56.2% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1977 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1978 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 2,064 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1979 | 62–27 | 69.7% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 12 | 1978 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1980 | 69–26 | 72.6% | — | 2,135 | 0 | 14 | 1979 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1981 | 45–23 | 66.2% | — | 2,050 | 0 | 15 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1982 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 2,070 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1984 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #5 | 2,022 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1985 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,960 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1986 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,864 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,779 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #135 | 1,651 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,631 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |