H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Wendy Turnbull vs Virginia Wade H2H: 7-10
Virginia Wade holds a 10–7 lead over Wendy Turnbull in their WTA head-to-head. Across 17 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Virginia Wade leads 3–2 on carpet. Most recently, Wendy Turnbull won the 1981 Tampa fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 73
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
7
–
10
17 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 81
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 1981* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Wendy Turnbull | 6-2 6-3 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Sep 18, 1980* | Las Vegas | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Wendy Turnbull | 7-6 6-3 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1979 | Boston | WTA 250 | BR | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | (w/o) | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1979* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Wendy Turnbull | 5-7 6-3 6-2 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Jan 20, 1979* | Houston | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-3 6-2 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Nov 17, 1978* | Palm Springs | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Virginia Wade | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1978* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Wendy Turnbull | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Feb 4, 1978* | Chicago | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 7-5 6-4 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1978* | Hollywood | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Wendy Turnbull | 6-3 7-5 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Sep 10, 1977* | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Wendy Turnbull | 6-2 6-1 | Virginia Wade | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1976* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Virginia Wade | 6-1 6-2 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1975* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Virginia Wade | 6-0 6-1 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1973* | West Kirby | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Virginia Wade | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Jul 14, 1973* | Dublin | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Virginia Wade | 6-3 6-8 6-2 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1973* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Virginia Wade | 6-1 6-1 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| May 12, 1972* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Virginia Wade | 7-5 7-5 | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
| Jan 7, 1972* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Virginia Wade | (w/o) | Wendy Turnbull | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Turnbull | #346 | #3 | 38 | 2,181 | 585 | 330 | 63.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 18 |
| Virginia Wade | #138 | #40 | — | 2,313 | 865 | 314 | 73.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 51 | 58 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy Turnbull | Virginia Wade | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1975 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 | 1968 | 85–19 | 81.7% | — | 1,945 | 1 | 9 |
| 23 | 1976 | 27–21 | 56.2% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 10 | 1969 | 82–18 | 82.0% | — | 2,118 | 1 | 16 |
| 24 | 1977 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 10 | 1970 | 69–22 | 75.8% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 21 |
| 25 | 1978 | 54–23 | 70.1% | — | 2,064 | 0 | 10 | 1971 | 64–16 | 80.0% | — | 2,161 | 1 | 29 |
| 26 | 1979 | 62–27 | 69.7% | — | 2,071 | 0 | 12 | 1972 | 75–23 | 76.5% | — | 2,151 | 2 | 34 |
| 27 | 1980 | 69–26 | 72.6% | — | 2,135 | 0 | 14 | 1973 | 63–16 | 79.7% | — | 2,158 | 2 | 40 |
| 28 | 1981 | 45–23 | 66.2% | — | 2,050 | 0 | 15 | 1974 | 60–16 | 78.9% | — | 2,189 | 2 | 45 |
| 29 | 1982 | 47–20 | 70.1% | — | 2,070 | 0 | 17 | 1975 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 2,313 | 2 | 51 |
| 30 | 1983 | 47–18 | 72.3% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 18 | 1976 | 48–17 | 73.8% | — | 2,256 | 2 | 53 |
| 31 | 1984 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #5 | 2,022 | 0 | 18 | 1977 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,274 | 3 | 55 |
| 32 | 1985 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #5 | 1,960 | 0 | 18 | 1978 | 69–25 | 73.4% | — | 2,240 | 3 | 58 |
| 33 | 1986 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,864 | 0 | 18 | 1979 | 51–26 | 66.2% | — | 2,088 | 3 | 58 |
| 34 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,779 | 0 | 18 | 1980 | 30–21 | 58.8% | — | 1,885 | 3 | 58 |
| 35 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #135 | 1,651 | 0 | 18 | 1981 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,824 | 3 | 58 |
| 36 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,631 | 0 | 18 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,749 | 3 | 58 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,788 | 3 | 58 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #61 | 1,728 | 3 | 58 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,712 | 3 | 58 |