H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Wendy White vs Dianne Van Rensburg H2H: 0-5
Dianne Van Rensburg holds a 5–0 lead over Wendy White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Dianne Van Rensburg leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Dianne Van Rensburg won the 1990 Albuquerque fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 1990* | Albuquerque | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Dianne Van Rensburg | 6-1 6-1 | Wendy White | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Dianne Van Rensburg | 6-2 7-6 | Wendy White | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1988* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Dianne Van Rensburg | 6-1 6-2 | Wendy White | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1988* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Dianne Van Rensburg | 6-3 6-4 | Wendy White | Match data |
| Jun 9, 1988* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Dianne Van Rensburg | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Wendy White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy White | #567 | #28 | 24 | 1,858 | 161 | 189 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dianne Van Rensburg | — | — | — | 1,790 | 82 | 92 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy White | Dianne Van Rensburg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–19 | 47.2% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 20–20 | 50.0% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1985 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #75 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1986 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #45 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1987 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1988 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #102 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #154 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |