H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Wendy White vs Helen Kelesi H2H: 1-2
Helen Kelesi holds a 2–1 lead over Wendy White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Helen Kelesi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Helen Kelesi won the 1988 Cincinnati fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1988* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Helen Kelesi | 6-3 6-2 | Wendy White | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1986* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Wendy White | 1-6 7-6 6-1 | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1986* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Helen Kelesi | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Wendy White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy White | #567 | #28 | 24 | 1,858 | 161 | 189 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wendy White | Helen Kelesi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1980 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1981 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1982 | 20–20 | 50.0% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1983 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #75 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1986 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #45 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1987 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #102 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #154 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |