H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Wiltrud Probst vs Donna Faber H2H: 1-2
Donna Faber holds a 2–1 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Donna Faber leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Wiltrud Probst won the 1991 Schenectady third round 7-5 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 1991* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Wiltrud Probst | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | Donna Faber | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1991* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Donna Faber | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1991* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Donna Faber | 6-2 6-0 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wiltrud Probst | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |