H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Wiltrud Probst vs Emanuela Zardo H2H: 2-0
Wiltrud Probst holds a 2–0 lead over Emanuela Zardo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wiltrud Probst leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wiltrud Probst won the 1992 Waregem quarterfinal 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 56
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 1992* | Waregem | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Wiltrud Probst | 7-5 6-2 | Emanuela Zardo | Match data |
| Feb 10, 1990* | Wellington | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Wiltrud Probst | 7-5 6-3 | Emanuela Zardo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Emanuela Zardo | #976 | #27 | 80 | 1,765 | 69 | 74 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wiltrud Probst | Emanuela Zardo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #89 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |