H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Wiltrud Probst vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 1-2
Isabel Cueto holds a 2–1 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Isabel Cueto leads 2–0 on clay, while Wiltrud Probst leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1989 Berlin third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1989* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 7-5 6-4 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
| Jul 28, 1988* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 6-4 6-3 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1988* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Wiltrud Probst | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Isabel Cueto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wiltrud Probst | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |