H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Wiltrud Probst vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 1-3
Leila Meskhi holds a 3–1 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Leila Meskhi leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1994 Hilton Head third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 1994* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Leila Meskhi | 6-1 6-2 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
| May 27, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Leila Meskhi | 6-2 6-4 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1991* | Bayonne | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Leila Meskhi | 7-5 6-4 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1990* | Wellington | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Wiltrud Probst | 1-6 6-4 6-0 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wiltrud Probst | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |