H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Wiltrud Probst vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 2-0
Wiltrud Probst holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Wiltrud Probst leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Wiltrud Probst won the 1995 Amelia Island second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 1995* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Wiltrud Probst | 6-1 6-4 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
| May 2, 1990* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Wiltrud Probst | 6-1 6-2 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Wiltrud Probst | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |