H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Wiltrud Probst vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 1-1
Wiltrud Probst and Natalia Medvedeva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natalia Medvedeva leads 1–0 on clay, while Wiltrud Probst leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wiltrud Probst won the 1994 Key Biscayne second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1994* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Wiltrud Probst | 6-1 6-4 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
| Jul 16, 1993* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Natalia Medvedeva | 7-5 6-0 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wiltrud Probst | Natalia Medvedeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |