H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Wiltrud Probst vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 0-1

Nathalie Herreman holds a 1–0 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1993 Paris round of 32 0-6 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Wiltrud Probst
GER Age 57 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #157 0-6 6-2 6-4 Wiltrud Probst #44 Match data Feb 18, 1993* R32 Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Wiltrud Probst #794 #31 344 1,756 119 161 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Wiltrud Probst Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1986 4–5 44.4% #135 1,510 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1987 9–14 39.1% #99 1,569 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1988 13–17 43.3% #80 1,623 0 0 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1989 11–13 45.8% #90 1,651 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1990 19–14 57.6% #40 1,706 0 1 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1991 9–18 33.3% #126 1,581 0 1 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1992 16–13 55.2% #40 1,707 0 2 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1993 10–18 35.7% #105 1,611 0 2 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1994 11–14 44.0% #69 1,630 0 2 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1995 7–11 38.9% #146 1,617 0 2 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1996 1–6 14.3% #113 1,574 0 2 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 1997 7–9 43.8% #84 1,600 0 2 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1998 2–9 18.2% #194 1,556 0 2 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Wiltrud Probst Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1990 10 6 16 62.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1991 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1992 3 2 5 60.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1994 6 5 11 54.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1996 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1997 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1998 0 2 2 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 51 88 42.0% 63 66 129 48.8% 7 15 22 31.8% 12 29 41 29.3% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Wiltrud Probst Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1986 1511 104.4 — — — — +66 +21 — 42.1% -0.32 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +1.63 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1987 1570 115.5 — — — — -32 +23 -24 41.5% -0.68 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.79 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1988 1623 127.8 — — — — -71 +18 -77 43.1% -0.81 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 102.0 -1.73 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1989 1651 120.9 — — — — -107 +48 — 46.4% -0.36 4–4 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 104.4 +0.43 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1990 1707 126.7 — — — — -62 +51 — 55.1% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.71 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1991 1581 115.5 — — — — -35 +106 -2 37.1% -0.81 3–5 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.0 -0.14 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1992 1707 141.5 — — — — -116 +108 — 54.0% +0.51 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 101.8 +0.07 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1993 1612 123.6 — — — — -42 +134 — 38.8% -0.58 5–6 (45%) 1–5 (17%) 95.7 +0.32 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1994 1631 135.0 — — — — 0 +60 — 48.2% -0.11 1–5 (17%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.74 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1995 1617 117.8 — — — — -12 +72 — 38.9% -0.95 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.10 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1996 1574 110.6 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.29 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 1997 1601 114.5 — — — — +11 +34 -44 32.4% -1.59 5–1 (83%) 1–1 — -0.08 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 1998 1556 112.7 — — — — +45 +4 — 24.0% -2.32 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.45 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
Career — 1756 130.7 — — — — -44 +58 -41 43.1% -0.53 42–40 (51%) 26–33 (44%) 100.9 +0.47 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.