H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Wiltrud Probst vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 4-0
Wiltrud Probst holds a 4–0 lead over Nicole Jagerman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Wiltrud Probst leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Wiltrud Probst won the 1994 Key Biscayne first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1994* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Wiltrud Probst | 6-3 6-4 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
| May 9, 1992* | Waregem | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Wiltrud Probst | 7-6 6-4 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
| Sep 23, 1987* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Wiltrud Probst | 6-4 7-5 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1987* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Wiltrud Probst | 6-2 7-6 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nicole Jagerman | #685 | #43 | 24 | 1,736 | 79 | 99 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Wiltrud Probst | Nicole Jagerman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #72 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #68 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |