H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Helga Masthoff H2H: 2-0
Winnie Shaw holds a 2–0 lead over Helga Masthoff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Winnie Shaw leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1972 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1972* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-3 6-2 | Helga Masthoff | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1971* | Johannesburg | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Winnie Shaw | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Helga Masthoff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Helga Masthoff | — | — | — | 2,084 | 373 | 111 | 77.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 43 | 49 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Helga Masthoff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | 1968 | 26–12 | 68.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | 1969 | 42–13 | 76.4% | — | 1,895 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 1970 | 50–11 | 82.0% | — | 2,046 | 0 | 16 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | 1971 | 38–9 | 80.9% | — | 2,053 | 0 | 23 |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | 1972 | 28–11 | 71.8% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 27 |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | 1973 | 36–13 | 73.5% | — | 2,028 | 0 | 29 |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | 1974 | 27–9 | 75.0% | — | 2,013 | 0 | 32 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 25–8 | 75.8% | — | 1,972 | 0 | 36 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 34–8 | 81.0% | — | 1,940 | 0 | 41 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 18–4 | 81.8% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 44 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 13–5 | 72.2% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 44 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 10–1 | 90.9% | — | 1,929 | 0 | 47 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 26–7 | 78.8% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 49 |