H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Ingrid Bentzer H2H: 2-0
Winnie Shaw holds a 2–0 lead over Ingrid Bentzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Winnie Shaw leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1972 Madrid fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1972* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Winnie Shaw | 6-3 6-3 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
| Feb 4, 1972* | Copenhagen | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Winnie Shaw | 7-5 6-4 | Ingrid Bentzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Ingrid Bentzer | — | — | — | 1,826 | 72 | 99 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Ingrid Bentzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1968 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | 1970 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | 1971 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 1972 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | 1973 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | 1975 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | 1976 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,640 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 7 |