H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Jackie Fayter H2H: 5-0
Winnie Shaw holds a 5–0 lead over Jackie Fayter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Winnie Shaw leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1973 St. Moritz final 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1973* | St. Moritz | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Winnie Shaw | 6-1 6-0 | Jackie Fayter | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1972* | St. Moritz | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Winnie Shaw | 6-1 6-0 | Jackie Fayter | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1971* | Billingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Winnie Shaw | 6-0 6-1 | Jackie Fayter | Match data |
| Jun 17, 1971* | Queen's Club | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-1 6-2 | Jackie Fayter | Match data |
| May 27, 1970* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-1 6-3 | Jackie Fayter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Jackie Fayter | — | — | — | 1,723 | 121 | 143 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Jackie Fayter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 17–29 | 37.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 24–17 | 58.5% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1976 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | 1977 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | 1978 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |