H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Janice Townsend H2H: 3-0
Winnie Shaw holds a 3–0 lead over Janice Townsend in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Winnie Shaw leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1968 Torquay fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1968* | Torquay | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Winnie Shaw | 6-2 6-4 | Janice Townsend | Match data |
| Nov 1, 1968* | Port Talbot | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Winnie Shaw | 11-9 6-3 | Janice Townsend | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1968* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-3 8-6 | Janice Townsend | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Janice Townsend | — | — | — | 1,718 | 58 | 46 | 55.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Janice Townsend | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 20–16 | 55.6% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |