H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Kristien Shaw H2H: 1-1
Winnie Shaw and Kristien Shaw are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Winnie Shaw leads 1–0 on clay, while Kristien Shaw leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1971 Fulham third round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1971* | Fulham | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Winnie Shaw | 6-4 6-0 | Kristien Shaw | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1971* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Kristien Shaw | 6-4 6-4 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Kristien Shaw | — | — | — | 1,929 | 119 | 141 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Kristien Shaw | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 12–10 | 54.5% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 23–25 | 47.9% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–13 | 13.3% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 29–24 | 54.7% | — | 1,913 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,802 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,834 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1978 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |