H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Winnie Shaw vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 0-1

Lea Antonoplis holds a 1–0 lead over Winnie Shaw in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1979 Edinburgh semifinal 5-7 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Winnie Shaw
GBR
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis 5-7 6-3 6-3 Winnie Shaw Match data Jul 14, 1979* SF Edinburgh WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Winnie Shaw — — — 1,995 296 144 67.3% 0 0 0 1 13 14
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Winnie Shaw Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1
21 1968 49–28 63.6% — 1,778 0 1 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2
22 1969 69–27 71.9% — 1,905 0 3 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2
23 1970 55–26 67.9% — 1,944 0 6 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2
24 1971 46–26 63.9% — 1,860 0 7 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2
25 1972 32–12 72.7% — 1,909 0 11 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2
26 1973 2–2 50.0% — 1,874 0 12 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2
27 1974 5–3 62.5% — 1,859 0 12 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2
28 1975 10–6 62.5% — 1,820 0 12 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2
29 1976 4–5 44.4% — 1,753 0 12 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2
30 1977 8–2 80.0% — 1,809 0 14 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2
31 1978 12–5 70.6% — 1,792 0 14 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2
32 1979 4–2 66.7% — 1,767 0 14 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Winnie Shaw Lea Antonoplis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1968 11 8 19 57.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 13 6 19 68.4% 13 7 20 65.0% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1969 15 7 22 68.2% 24 9 33 72.7% 27 10 37 73.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 28 11 39 71.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
24 1971 8 2 10 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 21 13 34 61.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
25 1972 4 1 5 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1973 — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1974 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1975 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1976 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 1978 — — — — — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 21 66 68.2% 75 38 113 66.4% 122 57 179 68.2% 43 25 68 63.2% — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Winnie Shaw Lea Antonoplis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92
21 1968 1779 125.2 — — — — +80 -137 -118 60.0% +0.94 14–9 (61%) — — -3.79 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51
22 1969 1906 138.6 — — — — +29 -69 +21 67.3% +1.34 15–8 (65%) — — -3.53 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92
23 1970 1945 150.7 — — — — +34 -93 +134 64.5% +1.34 13–8 (62%) 0–1 — -6.98 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22
24 1971 1861 145.2 — — — — +77 +27 +71 61.1% +0.99 9–8 (53%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 -1.18 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47
25 1972 1909 141.3 — — — — +62 +41 -11 71.3% +1.47 7–2 (78%) 2–1 (67%) 105.0 -0.22 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39
26 1973 1875 118.0 — — — — — — -20 55.6% +1.67 0–1 — — +0.17 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25
27 1974 1860 123.7 — — — — +72 +91 — 58.8% +0.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.45 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93
28 1975 1820 132.4 — — — — +137 +77 +16 65.8% +1.37 1–5 (17%) — — +1.98 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71
29 1976 1753 113.7 — — — — — +99 +83 50.0% 0.00 0–2 1–1 — +0.32 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67
30 1977 1810 127.5 — — — — — — +125 70.8% +1.37 3–1 (75%) — — +0.97 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78
31 1978 1792 120.6 — — — — — — +161 65.0% +1.20 4–2 (67%) — — +2.28 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
32 1979 1767 110.6 — — — — — — — 64.3% +1.22 1–1 — — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1995 143.0 — — — — +60 -39 +50 64.1% +1.18 68–47 (59%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -2.07 — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.