H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Winnie Shaw vs Lea Pericoli H2H: 0-1

Lea Pericoli holds a 1–0 lead over Winnie Shaw in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Pericoli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1969 Cairo semifinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Winnie Shaw
GBR
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lea Pericoli
ITA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Pericoli 6-2 6-2 Winnie Shaw Match data Mar 11, 1969* SF Cairo WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Winnie Shaw — — — 1,995 296 144 67.3% 0 0 0 1 13 14
Lea Pericoli — — — 1,772 58 51 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Winnie Shaw Lea Pericoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1968 49–28 63.6% — 1,778 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 1969 69–27 71.9% — 1,905 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 1970 55–26 67.9% — 1,944 0 6 — — — — — — —
24 1971 46–26 63.9% — 1,860 0 7 — — — — — — —
25 1972 32–12 72.7% — 1,909 0 11 — — — — — — —
26 1973 2–2 50.0% — 1,874 0 12 — — — — — — —
27 1974 5–3 62.5% — 1,859 0 12 — — — — — — —
28 1975 10–6 62.5% — 1,820 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 1976 4–5 44.4% — 1,753 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 1977 8–2 80.0% — 1,809 0 14 — — — — — — —
31 1978 12–5 70.6% — 1,792 0 14 — — — — — — —
32 1979 4–2 66.7% — 1,767 0 14 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 1968 8–5 61.5% — 1,586 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1969 15–7 68.2% — 1,705 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 1970 11–7 61.1% — 1,756 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 1971 9–8 52.9% — 1,752 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 1972 3–6 33.3% — 1,659 0 3
38 — — — — — — — 1973 4–3 57.1% — 1,648 0 3
39 — — — — — — — 1974 6–6 50.0% — 1,641 0 3
40 — — — — — — — 1975 2–7 22.2% — 1,554 0 3
41 — — — — — — — 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,548 0 3

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Winnie Shaw Lea Pericoli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1968 1779 125.2 — — — — +80 -137 -118 60.0% +0.94 14–9 (61%) — — -3.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1969 1906 138.6 — — — — +29 -69 +21 67.3% +1.34 15–8 (65%) — — -3.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1970 1945 150.7 — — — — +34 -93 +134 64.5% +1.34 13–8 (62%) 0–1 — -6.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1971 1861 145.2 — — — — +77 +27 +71 61.1% +0.99 9–8 (53%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 -1.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1972 1909 141.3 — — — — +62 +41 -11 71.3% +1.47 7–2 (78%) 2–1 (67%) 105.0 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1973 1875 118.0 — — — — — — -20 55.6% +1.67 0–1 — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1974 1860 123.7 — — — — +72 +91 — 58.8% +0.77 1–0 1–0 — +0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1975 1820 132.4 — — — — +137 +77 +16 65.8% +1.37 1–5 (17%) — — +1.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1976 1753 113.7 — — — — — +99 +83 50.0% 0.00 0–2 1–1 — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1977 1810 127.5 — — — — — — +125 70.8% +1.37 3–1 (75%) — — +0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1978 1792 120.6 — — — — — — +161 65.0% +1.20 4–2 (67%) — — +2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1979 1767 110.6 — — — — — — — 64.3% +1.22 1–1 — — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1586 120.0 — — — — +5 +12 — 70.8% +1.92 1–1 — — +0.13
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1705 134.1 — — — — — +26 — 67.3% +1.55 2–3 (40%) — — -1.00
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1757 135.6 — — — — — -3 -150 60.5% +1.24 3–1 (75%) — — -0.73
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1752 125.6 — — — — — +1 — 50.0% +0.08 3–1 (75%) — — -0.10
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1659 111.6 — — — — — +28 — 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.57
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1648 114.4 — — — — — +17 — 80.0% +2.50 — — — +1.43
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1642 116.2 — — — — — +20 — 51.7% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.98
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1555 100.4 — — — — — +15 — 33.3% -1.19 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +1.40
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1548 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.12
Career — 1995 143.0 — — — — +60 -39 +50 64.1% +1.18 68–47 (59%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -2.07 — 1773 132.2 — — — — +5 +14 -150 56.0% +0.67 12–14 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 +2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.