H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Lesley Charles H2H: 2-1
Winnie Shaw holds a 2–1 lead over Lesley Charles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Winnie Shaw leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lesley Charles won the 1976 Sutton fourth round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1976* | Sutton | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lesley Charles | 6-2 7-6 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| May 24, 1974* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Winnie Shaw | 4-6 6-1 7-5 | Lesley Charles | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1970* | Port Talbot | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Winnie Shaw | 6-0 6-1 | Lesley Charles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Lesley Charles | — | — | — | 1,797 | 198 | 139 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Lesley Charles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 22–12 | 64.7% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1978 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | 1979 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | 1980 | 23–7 | 76.7% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 1981 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 16 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |