H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Linda Tuero H2H: 0-3
Linda Tuero holds a 3–0 lead over Winnie Shaw in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Linda Tuero leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Linda Tuero won the 1972 Madrid semifinal 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 1972* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Linda Tuero | 6-2 6-2 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1971* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Linda Tuero | 7-5 6-1 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1971* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Linda Tuero | 6-1 6-1 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Linda Tuero | — | — | — | 1,972 | 175 | 78 | 69.2% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Linda Tuero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 29–10 | 74.4% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 22–6 | 78.6% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 9 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 45–15 | 75.0% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 13 |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 23–17 | 57.5% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 13 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |