H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Lindsay Blachford H2H: 1-1
Winnie Shaw and Lindsay Blachford are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1975 Wimbledon first round 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1975* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Lindsay Blachford | Match data |
| May 31, 1973* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Lindsay Blachford | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Lindsay Blachford | — | — | — | 1,636 | 55 | 79 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Lindsay Blachford | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |