H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Lindsey Beaven H2H: 4-0
Winnie Shaw holds a 4–0 lead over Lindsey Beaven in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Winnie Shaw leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1971 Wembley fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1971* | Wembley | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Winnie Shaw | 6-4 6-2 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
| Dec 2, 1970* | Scottish Indoors | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Winnie Shaw | 6-2 6-3 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
| May 29, 1970* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-1 6-4 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1969* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-2 6-0 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Lindsey Beaven | — | — | — | 1,738 | 121 | 133 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Lindsey Beaven | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | 1977 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |