H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Marcie Louie H2H: 1-0
Winnie Shaw holds a 1–0 lead over Marcie Louie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Winnie Shaw leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1972 Wimbledon third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 1972* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-2 6-2 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Marcie Louie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |