H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Nell Truman H2H: 5-0
Winnie Shaw holds a 5–0 lead over Nell Truman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Winnie Shaw leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1971 Madrid semifinal 3-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1971* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Winnie Shaw | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Nell Truman | Match data |
| Nov 1, 1970* | Port Talbot | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Winnie Shaw | 6-1 10-8 | Nell Truman | Match data |
| Oct 24, 1970* | Manchester | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Winnie Shaw | 9-7 2-6 6-0 | Nell Truman | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1968* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Nell Truman | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1968* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Nell Truman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Nell Truman | — | — | — | 1,763 | 112 | 106 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Nell Truman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 24–23 | 51.1% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 26–31 | 45.6% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | 1972 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |