H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Winnie Shaw vs Olga Morozova H2H: 1-2
Olga Morozova holds a 2–1 lead over Winnie Shaw in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Olga Morozova leads 2–0 on clay, while Winnie Shaw leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1972 Queens Club fourth round 6-4 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1972* | Queens Club | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Olga Morozova | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1969* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Olga Morozova | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1969* | Alexandria | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Olga Morozova | 7-5 6-1 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Olga Morozova | — | — | — | 2,189 | 328 | 108 | 75.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 30 | 38 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Winnie Shaw | Olga Morozova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 41–9 | 82.0% | — | 1,908 | 0 | 13 |
| 22 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,870 | 0 | 17 |
| 23 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 53–13 | 80.3% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 24 |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 38–11 | 77.6% | — | 2,022 | 0 | 29 |
| 25 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 55–14 | 79.7% | — | 2,166 | 0 | 33 |
| 26 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 41–18 | 69.5% | — | 2,048 | 0 | 35 |
| 27 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | 25–10 | 71.4% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 36 |
| 28 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 1977 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 2,027 | 0 | 36 |
| 29 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 | 1979 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 2,038 | 0 | 37 |
| 31 | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 | 1980 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 2,039 | 0 | 38 |
| 32 | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |